Honorable Performance, Benchmarking on Video

Although not my fashion of video game, I did notwithstanding find For Honour fun to play. More than chiefly, for those of you who love action fighting games, the title appears to be well optimized on PC.

Gamers playing at 1080p should accept little problem maxing out the visuals equally last season's R9 380 and GTX 960 both delivered playable performance in our tests, while the RX 470, GTX 970 and R9 390 all delivered a satisfying experience as well.

Those concluding three cards were also rather capable at 1440p, though for a truly smooth feel you lot volition want something similar the Fury X, 980 Ti or GTX 1070. As always, 4K gaming is best left to the big boys, making the Titan XP and GTX 1080 the only actually relevant GPUs here, at least for now.

The game isn't hugely CPU demanding merely it does take total reward of quad-cadre processors and yous volition want at least four threads available. The Hyper-Threading-equipped Core i3-6100 worked just fine and was able to push button the Titan XP surprisingly hard.

As for the AMD FX-series... well, we're nearing the cease of that long and bumpy road. AMD is no dubiousness eager to conclude that chapter of its history with the arrival of Ryzen next calendar month and we tin can't wait to encounter what they have in store for united states.

Watch Steve as he benchmarks 'For Honor' in the video below...

In the meantime, information technology looks like Cadre i5 owners have the near optimal flake for this championship and overclocking the Core i5-2500K will even allow it to rub shoulders with the newer i5 models as well as the Cadre i7-7700K.

  • Bank check out For Honor Reviews and Ratings
  • Buy For Accolade on Steam

For Honor worked flawlessly with hardware from both GPU camps and while we're happy to see such a well-polished triple-A title on the PC, nosotros hope Ubisoft tin do something most the functioning of side by side month's Ghost Recon Wildlands release.